http://masscases.com/cases/sjc/419/419mass334.html WebCiting Commonwealth v. Long, 419 Mass. 798, 804 (1995), in which the Supreme Judicial Court held that a trial judge abused his discretion by empanelling a juror who would not state unequivocally that he would be impartial, the defendant argues . 7 ... See Commonwealth v. Gallison, 383 Mass. 659, 672
SOUZA, COMMONWEALTH vs., 39 Mass. App. Ct. 103
WebCommonwealth v. Gallison, 383 Mass. 659, 672 (1981). Commonwealth v. Chalifoux, 362 Mass. 811, 815-816 (1973). In general, such evidence is competent where it has a tendency to show a common scheme, a pattern of operation, absence of accident or mistake, intent, or motive. Commonwealth v. Webo Mass Health • Professionals including court personnel, parent support organizations, and representatives from the provider community, including many from both the Massachusetts Provider’s Council and the Children’s League of Massachusetts; • Birth parents and extended family members, foster families, adoptive families, kinship families; christinealdridgehoughtonlake
COMMONWEALTH v. CASH (2024) FindLaw
WebJun 28, 2024 · Commonwealth v. Gallison, 383 Mass. 659, 671 (1981). The defendant bears the burden of proving that the offenses were unrelated and that the prejudice from joinder prevented him from obtaining a fair trial. See Commonwealth v. Gaynor, 443 Mass. 245, 260 (2005). The trial judge did not abuse her discretion in denying the motion to sever. WebSee Mass.R.Crim.P. 9(a)(1), 378 Mass. 859 (1979). "Whether or not indictments joined for trial should be severed is a matter within the sound discretion of the judge." Commonwealth v. Doyle, 5 Mass. App. Ct. 544, 547 (1977). Commonwealth v. Gallison, 383 Mass. 659, 671 (1981). The defendant has not shown that the judge abused his discretion. christine albert notarin halle